I am pretty sure I did not ask about your personal biography @Aspurg(istan) that is trying to evade his ban.
stan is suitable too, as ofc do you know the etymology of "Aspurg"? It's an Iranian Sarmatian name attested in Tanais and elsewhere.
Btw I said nothing out of ordinary on anthrogenica, first ban was me telling Bruzmi that he will not "inferiorise" V13 with his "
V13 was in Balkans forever just standing in one place and being assimilated by the others". And the second was after I posted a link to Cognitive Dissonance article in my post as he was still mentioning Western Balkans just after Southern Arch paper was published.
Excine decided to make personal attacks against me based on false notions about me, making assumptions, as he couldn't debate me. I don't get "hurt" by implying Albanian connection as I'm no self-identifying Serb. I do get irritated about implying I have no Nomad-Bulgarian connection as I invested considerable time successfully proving from the DNA and the historical sources POV that I do. Originally that is how I came to anthrogenica.
Interesting, I just looked up what this poreklo thing is that you are a member of. You as a Serb from Bjelo qkula and as far as I can tell it is a Serbian DNA project and also as usual a bunch of pseudoscientific fantastical Slavic autochthonist theories.
Yes I am from Bijelo Polje, maybe the oldest attested family from that area.
As far as I know, on poreklo there are almost no Slavic autochthonist people, almost all claim that I2a is Slavic in origin. I am poreklo forum member but I am not poreklo society member. Poreklo forum members are various, atm member is also user KučPalabardi, who is I think a Rrenjet administrator. Also Rugovac, who was supposedly Albanian, though some disputed this.
You're a Slav, what the hell is a father of Montenegrin extraction? A Montenegrin Serb father and a Bosniak mother lol Serbs are a Slavic people hence you cannot claim to be of Non-Slavic origin as a Slav.
You are Albanian, and some Albanians such as that "Rugovac" claimed along the lines that maternal uncle is not related to you, and that member of the same tribe, same paternal ancestor from 300 years back is closer than any maternal side relative.
So from that perspective, one can claim to be anything his father was, his grandfather, his fathers fathers father, his greatgreatgreatgreatgreatgreatgreatgreatgreatgreatgreatgreatgreatgreatgreatgrandfather etc..
So I can be whatever was my paternal ancestor at a given time in all of history.
I have total right to call myself Bulgarian, as in 14th century my ancestors were Bulgarian, and they did not fully assimilate into the locals until the 16th century.
Also as Cuman names seem stronger than it should be for Slavic Bulgarians, such connection looks obvious (might mention Pecheneg connection in C.Balkans).
Btw. I talked about this to Bulgarian dignitaries. I always mean business. I know more ambassadors and diplomats than there are people posting here daily, so why should I care about some insignificant internet space owners and who they ban or not. Anthrogenica as the most active DNA site is still a micro site.
Where do you plot on a PCA?
I recall being closer to Bosniaks or Croats than to Serbs, clustering only with NE Serbs. My Bosniak side is mostly Central Bosnia and these are known to have more Slavic ancestry than maybe even all of Croats (as these have some Western-German input).
This is because Bosniaks from Central Bosnia descend of islamized locals who did not mix with the Vlachs much (maybe some older Roman elements), whereas Bosniaks from Northern Bosnia and Herzegovina are basically loaded with Islamized Serbo-Vlach element.
Some Balkan lower than avg. , some Anatolia, that was on FTDNA, but I need to do a better auDNA test tbh.
Sure sure Paeonia that has yielded from North to South R1b-Z2103>CTS1450 lineages which Albanians in "NMCD" have lots of and the Slavs 0% of.
Typical Slavic autochonist. Neither Dardania nor Paeonia nor any Balkan region is a Urheimat for Slavs you crackpot. Neither your beloved "Montenegro" aka Illyrian Glasinac J2b-L283>Z1297+ territory.
I think N.Macedonians do have CTS1450, both Albanian and other lineages.
Never been autochtonist. That's a point of view and time. Are Kosovo Albanians native to Kosovo past the 400 year mark, vast majority are not, maybe they were 1500 years ago. Are Croatian and Bosnian Serbs native to the region? Only to Eastern Herzegovina past the 500 year mark.
Are the Bosniaks from the NW and NE Bosnia native to that area past the 500 year period. No, they for the most part descend of Serbo-Vlachs who got Islamized in 6th century, and actually the home of modern NE Bosniaks is Western Serbia, for some even Sandzak etc.
Also obviously Illyrians got displaced and killed by the Romans, and by the time of Slavic invasion in the Western Balkans Justinian plague reduced the long-ago admixed and romanised Illyrian elements to a minimum.
Regarding the Montenegrins, they seem to have a different base to that of Serbs, and Porphyrogenites does not say that Diocleans were of Serbian origin. Their Serbian connection comes later. On the other hand even the most Bosnian of all Medieval Bosnians descend from original Bosnia from Sarajevo to Zenica, have plenty of PH908, and in 10th century that small Bosnia was part of Serbia, so likely some PH908 Serboids settled around Bathinus river and started calling themselves Bosnians, in the same fashion Slavs around Neretva river were Narentians.
Southern Croats same. All of these are basically very similar, and they are totally shaped by religion. If a Serb becomes Catholic he becomes a "Croat", if he becomes a Muslim he becomes a "Bosniak" etc. Personal name is the most important element of their ethnicity.
Who cares about modern day ethnicities anyway.
