Key to the terms used (from Davidski's blog):
Ancestral South Eurasian (ASE): this is a really basal cluster that peaks in tribal groups of Southeast Asia. It's probably very similar in some ways to the Ancestral South Indian (ASI) component described by Reich et al. a few years ago.
Western European/Unknown Hunter-Gatherer (WHG-UHG): this essentially looks like a West Eurasian forager component, and includes the forager-like stuff carried by Neolithic farmers (Oetzi the Iceman has 40% of it).
Early Neolithic Farmer (ENF): I'd say that this is the component of the earliest Neolithic farmers from the Fertile Crescent.
The other three components should be easy to work out from their names. They're almost identical to several components with the same or similar names from my other tests.
Some of you might be wondering why this test doesn't offer an Early European Farmer (EEF) cluster. But the answer to that should be obvious by now. EEF is not a stable ancestral component. It's actually a composite of at least two ancient components, including the so called Basal Eurasian and WHG-UHG. If it really was a genuine ancestral component, like ANE, then I'm pretty sure I'd be able catch it with ADMIXTURE. But I can't.
My results (via GEDmatch):
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffff"]Population[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffff, align: right"] [/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffff"]ANE[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #F1F1FF, align: right"]10.28%[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffff"]ASE[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #FDFDFF, align: right"]0.79%[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffff"]WHG-UHG[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #C2C2FF, align: right"]46.94%[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffff"]East_Eurasian[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffff, align: right"]- [/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffff"]West_African[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #FEFEFF, align: right"]0.69%[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffff"]East_African[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #FEFEFF, align: right"]0.42%[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #ffffff"]ENF[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #CACAFF, align: right"]40.87%[/TD]