I could have been unlucky, but in my case I consider it a rather inaccurate tool.
I know very well that Romagnols often plot with central Italians, just as they may have smaller Greek, Balkan, Middle Eastern shares, but over 44% of southern Italian (Southern Italy + Sicily) seems to me to be an exaggeration: almost as if one had one of the parents from that area (!)
The same division proposed between the various reference populations is somewhat questionable...
Only the breakdowns of the macro-regional quotas seem realistic to me
![]()
![]()
![]()