• Don't want to see ads? Install an adblocker like uBlock Origin or use a Europe-based privacy-friendly browser like Vivaldi or Mullvad.

Immigration Dozens dead as vehicle crashed into crowd in Nice, France

There are different grades of cases and a huge number of conditions. Of course clearly most of them are not worthy of being locked up, but some have many clear signs through actions both what they state verbally and do physically that they might just qualify for some more rigorous monitoring.....(to be diplomatically correct)
Probably the biggest hindrance implementing monitoring or locking is that we have to rely on vague testing of psychological maladies. Most of them are considered as spectrum of symptoms and and based on definitions which change from decade to decade. A far cry from simple diagnosis of flu or cancer. On top of it, we have human rights and expensive liability in case of mistaken diagnoses.
 
Probably the biggest hindrance implementing monitoring or locking is that we have to rely on vague testing of psychological maladies. Most of them are considered as spectrum of symptoms and and based on definitions which change from decade to decade. A far cry from simple diagnosis of flu or cancer. On top of it, we have human rights and expensive liability in case of mistaken diagnoses.

All we have to do is put both weighs on a scale and try to figure out which is the heaviest ;)
 
http://www.nosharia.com/is Islam incompatable with modern society.htm
Islam identifies people and individuals by their religion: Non-Muslim and Muslim. This is a concept that cannot fit to any of modern definitions of citizenship. No civil society can function based on such defining identity. Dividing the society based on such clear-cut identity ultimately creates a society based on discrimination or ghettos. The legal aspect of such a division is beyond comprehension. Identifying groups of people or a country by their religion by default would mean denial of individual’s right and dignity, to place collective “minority rights” above individual rights”.

By this definition you are a muslim too. You only show up on Eupedia to talk about two groups of people, Muslims and the rest. Typical way for all extremists to see the world in clear cut vision, us (the best and the chosen and the only moral) and them (existential evil enemy). And like ISIS, you expect the conflict, the war, the Armageddon in fight to save the world from the evil. Have you been home schooled by fundamental Christians? You sound like Swedish education of tolerance and equality didn't leave a slightest mark on you.
 
All we have to do is put both weighs on a scale and try to figure out which is the heaviest ;)
I do subscribe to the notion that not a problem itself but the scale of a problem deserves addressing such problem in more aggressive way, suspending human rights for certain individuals. However I'm not sure if we there yet with sporadic (though terrible) situations of mental cases killing people. I would rather revise whole a judicial system in this department. I would psychologically, do brain scan, and genetically test all violent criminals, or any adults and kids with violent tendencies. They either would need to take meds indefinitely or till complete cure is found, or be indefinitely separated from society in mental institutions.
 
By this definition you are a muslim too. You only show up on Eupedia to talk about two groups of people, Muslims and the rest. Typical way for all extremists to see the world in clear cut vision, us (the best and the chosen and the only moral) and them (existential evil enemy). And like ISIS, you expect the conflict, the war, the Armageddon in fight to save the world from the evil. Have you been home schooled by fundamental Christians? You sound like Swedish education of tolerance and equality didn't leave a slightest mark on you.
I wonder if the ones who believe Islam is compatible with modern civilization can distinguish the difference between civil and criminal matters when a so-called Islamic husband beats his wife or daughter. Do you consider this act as a crime or a civil matter? How about child-marriage? Do you consider it as a crime or religious obligation of a religious father? How about forcing a child to have Hijab and depriving girls of interacting freely with others and enjoying sports, music and dance? Do you consider it as negligence and child abuse or is it a family matter and freedom of practicing their minority rights, their religion?
 
I wonder if the ones who believe Islam is compatible with modern civilization can distinguish the difference between civil and criminal matters when a so-called Islamic husband beats his wife or daughter.
The first beating of wife I learned as a kid was about my Christian neighbor beating his wife regularly, because God told him so. How convenient for a psychopath to believe in it!

How about child-marriage?
Existed in Christian Europe till not that long ago, and still exists in Christian part of Africa and Asia.

Do you consider it as a crime or religious obligation of a religious father? How about forcing a child to have
Hijab and depriving girls of interacting freely with others and enjoying sports, music and dance? Do you consider it as negligence and child abuse or is it a family matter and freedom of practicing their minority rights, their religion?
Again, all were and still are popular in many Christian and Hindu nations around the globe. Till you start criticizing all religions about these human rights violations I consider your posts having fundamental christians tone with strongly anti muslim agenda, and racist in nature.
 
" I consider your posts having fundamental christians tone with strongly anti muslim agenda, and racist in nature. "

I consider you are brainwashed neoliberal with strongly anti-christian sentiment.
 
LeBrok! Remember my brother that Jesus loves you so
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIRM7djfntw
It is his problem, however you forgotten about Jesus taching, forgotten about most important part of Jesus teaching, to love your neigbor and treat him like yourself, no matter what he and she is. And for this I'm sure you are not going to join him in heaven. Love and peace to all on earth is the quintessence of Jesus phylosophy. Instead you have followed your hateful heart.
The super irony is that I don't believe in him and I'm still a better "christian" than you are, lol. I'm more like Jesus and his teaching than you'll ever be.

I consider you are brainwashed neoliberal with strongly anti-christian sentiment.
Yah, yah, everybody nonchristian is antichristian for you. Same view like fundamental islam, just different religion. I advise you to hid again in your burrow and hug your fears, because the bad big evil world is going to get you. So did you get your fundamental christian home schooling?
 
Are there any Christians left in Sweden? There certainly are in the U.S. so it's more important in that context, I would think. (I must say, you have an extraordinary familiarity with the details of American life, for a Swede, so perhaps you've at least lived here for a time?)

However, if you've lived here you obviously didn't spend much time in church and/or with religious people, or pay attention to the declarations of groups like the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops or the Right to Life groups.

lol Fair question I suppose--I do invoke the good ol US of A often. I'm a dual Swedish/American citizen (through my mom). :grin: She was born in West Norway but raised as a good Norwegian Lutheran (heavy on tradition and family values) in the still conservative Bay Ridge, Brooklyn during the era of the Norwegians, Italians and Irish--who as you know, tend to have more than a passing fancy for Christianity. My mom is one of the most religious people I know and perfectly illustrates how religion could and should be the conduit for compassion, tolerance and open-mindedness, contrary to common belief and practice. We agree on a lot but still have our passionate quibbles, of course. lol

I primarily grew up in Sweden (yes, the least religious country in the West) but spent a lot of time in the US as a kid, adolescent and adult as well (did my undergrad and postgrad studies in NJ/NY)--throughout my life, my mom kept in contact with the Bay Ridge community even as it became less and less Norwegian, Italian and Irish and far more Puerto-Rican and Muslim Arab. Now, Bay Ridge is the epicenter of Brooklyn's Arab community. The predominantly Norwegian Lutheran Church my mom used to go to is now primarily comprised of Puerto-Ricans and Latinos. And best of all, there is even an Arab Lutheran church in the area. lol Brooklyn's immense racial, ethnic and religious diversity inspired me to eventually become a Brooklynite, though off and on, all over the place, and currently, part-time. :satisfied:

I've been to Lutheran churches, Catholic churches, Mosques and Synagogues and befriended many of their constituents, both deeply religious and secular. And guess what? I've heard similar messages from all of them--some of it good, some of it not so good. Admittedly, I'm biased--the Abrahamic religions are not my favorite, but that also allows me to be impartially critical of all of them. And I try my best to be equally critical, while still acknowledging that they individually present different concerns and problems. And I don't think a lot of people do that, which doesn't strike me as fair. Islam as a whole does have some glaringly problematic elements, but so does Christianity--not only are there fundamentalist Christian terrorists like the Ku Klux Klan who hate minorities, gays, are against women's rights (abortion, for example) but what about the Christian "terrorist" climate change deniers? How many future lives are risked because of their ignorance and backwards myopia? Of course, Americans and much of the West are going to have a Pro-Christian bias, but let's call it what it is: A BIAS. Put Christians and Christianity under the microscope and they fall apart like every other Abrahamic religion.

No one needs to make such requests of Christians because Christians take it upon themselves to condemn it in the strongest terms from the pulpits on Sundays, and not just through the declarations of organizing bodies, not that they really need to, because it's just unthinkable for the vast, vast majority of Christians to even contemplate such a thing. I'd like to see the imans of mosques do the same.

There is no meaningful comparison between these two situations, between what is taught from the pulpits of Christian churches, and what is taught in mosques (although they are getting more clever and not being so open recently) and in Muslim religious schools even in the west.

Respectfully, I think that this is an example of your bias towards Christianity.

1.) First of all, there is a difference between subscribing to (or claiming to subscribe to) extremist views and acting on them. Even if all of the 3,000,000 Muslims in America, for example, believed that infidels should be destroyed, an insignificantly small number of them have acted on that information, in the form of terrorist acts. Belief≠Action. Should people be criticized or penalized for what they think and believe or what they do?

2.) The Evangelical Protestants, in particular, painfully discredit your stance on Christians and their behavior Vs. Islam.

“The good news is that there’s 50 less pedophiles in this world, because, you know, these homosexuals are a bunch of disgusting perverts and pedophiles. That’s who was a victim here, are a bunch of, just, disgusting homosexuals at a gay bar, okay? And then I’m sure it’s also gonna be used to push an agenda against so-called “hate speech.” So Bible-believing Christian preachers who preach what the Bible actually says about homosexuality — that it’s vile, that it’s disgusting, that they’re reprobates — you know, we’re gonna be blamed. Like, “It’s all extremism! It’s not just the Muslims, it’s the Christians!” I’m sure that that’s coming. I’m sure that people are gonna start attacking, you know, Bible-believing Christians now, because of what this guy did.I’m not sad about it, I’m not gonna cry about it. Because these 50 people in a gay bar that got shot up, they were gonna die of AIDS, and syphilis, and whatever else. They were all gonna die early, anyway, because homosexuals have a 20-year shorter life-span than normal people, anyway.”
— Steven Anderson, preacher at Faithful Word Baptist Church, Tempe, AZ in response to the slaughter in Orlando. Yes, Christians and their leaders are pillars of human virtue. [[sarcasm overload]] In Pew Polls, Muslims actually fare better in overall tolerance and moderation compared to the Christian Evangelicals, which doesn't surprise me because Evangelicals are the fundamentalists of Christianity but the real threats they bring to democracy, peace and order tend to go neglected in the face of Islamic fundamentalism, which is also quite dangerous, insidiously and/or blatantly, so. Worse, Evangelicals most certainly have a powerful, influential voice and presence within American politics--their extremism and insanity have been normalized and mainstreamed! One of them just recently came very close to being the Republican nominee for President! But no, that doesn't get the focus it deserves. Instead, Islam is still considered to be the leading threat to Western democracy--oh no, it certainly has competition. Moreover, someone like Trump may not be an Evangelical, but he is certainly Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin and Erdogan adjacent.

Now, the moronic millennials think they're entitled to not only free education, and free health care, which I understand, but to free housing, free food etc. I used to call these kinds of people Gucci Socialists. They didn't want to give up their Gucci shoes, they wanted everyone to have them. It never occurred to them that if everyone had them they would lose a lot of their value.

I don't know when Millennial bashing became so popular. lol But I know that it's usually unfair and uncalled for. Baby boomers, especially conservative ones, seem hellbent on subscribing characteristics and motives to us that I rarely ever see myself, as a millennial. We are neither unduly entitled nor naive (every generation has this, anyway)--we are the most educated (and mired in debt), to the point of being overqualified for the lackluster, overworked, poor paying opportunities out there for us (when we can find them, because there is an egregious shortage of jobs); we're technologically savvy and advanced, far more than previous generations, but we still have to work much harder with more skill and less stability. That's not fair. Is it wrong to feel that way? All we want is equality--an EQUAL shot, an EQUAL chance to succeed at life. We want what the baby boomer generation had--the baby boomers who shafted us and didn't pass on those same opportunities. We do believe that we deserve more, more than what we have now, and considering what we do! More, for us me simply means equal to what your generation enjoyed.
 
I didn't realise you were such a cry (millennial) baby.

I don't know when Millennial bashing became so popular. lol But I know that it's usually unfair and uncalled for. Baby boomers, especially conservative ones, seem hellbent on subsribing characteristics and traits to us that I rarely ever see myself, as a millennial. We are neither unduly entitled nor naive (every generation has this, anyway)--we are the most educated (and mired in debt)
Probably not if we measure millennials debt in relative dollar value, and us "baby boomers" parents helping and opening our fat boomer wallets for kids education.

, to the point of being overqualified for the lackluster, overworked, poor paying opportunities out there for us (when we can find them, because there is an egregious shortage of jobs);
You should go back to New York than, where jobs are plenty. You not going to find good jobs in boreal forests, no matter how lovely they seem to you. ;) First of all I'm yet to find millennials who are very eager to leave parents houses and really work hard, and care for work to make sure they survive without their parents handouts. When I look at my kids and my friends kids, no generation had better opportunities than they have, and fancy shmancy jobs they are getting, with paid by parents education. On top of it, baby boomers are retiring in droves, the problem is that millennials don't want these old stinky jobs.
And for many, there is good service and cosy atmosphere in mama's basement to even think about leaving.


we're technologically savvy and advanced, far more than previous generations, but we still have to work much harder with more skill and less stability.
Perhaps if millennials could stop texting for a moment, they could have had work done and made better money.

That's not fair. Is it wrong to feel that way? All we want is equality--an EQUAL shot, an EQUAL chance to succeed at life.
What an attitude. Millennials want to make same money for same position as boomers with 30 year experience. I think the good meaning of Equality got lost in millennial's greed.

We want what the baby boomer generation had--the baby boomers who shafted us and didn't pass on those same opportunities.
Total blindness. We protected you, our millennial kids, with so much love to the point of handicapping you. I'm sorry for this. We gave you so much and pampered you so well, then when you left the house, the world seems tough and cruel in comparison. Well, get used to it, it is a real world, stop complaining and make it better.

We do believe that we deserve more, more than what we have now, and considering what we do! More, for us me simply means equal to you.
We should start slapping you around the way our parents did in crowded small houses with 10 siblings fighting for every square inch and piece of dry bread. So when you leave this shithole and sniff "same old cruel world" it will feel like a paradise to you. Whahahahahahahahaha.

Of course, I hope, you were reading this like a good satire of millennials, and good humor. ;) I wouldn't dare harming our sweet kids. You are so adorable and cute...
 
:laughing::laughing::laughing: I actually laughed out loud. I'm pretty certain my own parents would agree with much of this, and even I agree with some of this "satire." :wary2: lol

I didn't realise you were such a cry (millennial) baby.

Probably not if we measure millennials debt in relative dollar value, and us "baby boomers" parents helping and opening our fat boomer wallets for kids education.

Lol For me personally, I could've gone to school for free or for relatively nothing in Europe, but I demanded the overpriced American University system. lol And my wonderful parents did pay for my super expensive undergrad and some of my grad. Then my father told me that if i wanted to be a "professional, career student" in America, I'd have to do it on my own dime. :laughing: And that was fair! But education should be a birthright. It's fine for private institutions to cost more, but the public institutions should be free or close to it. And nowadays, us millennials can't just compete in the global market with only a bachelors degree or less like you guys could. ;) Now, postgrad education is pretty much a requirement.

You should go back to New York than, where jobs are plenty. You not going to find good jobs in boreal forests, no matter how lovely they seem to you. ;) First of all I'm yet to find millennials who are very eager to leave parents houses and really work hard, and care for work to make sure they survive without their parents handouts. When I look at my kids and my friends kids, no generation had better opportunities than they have, and fancy shmancy jobs they are getting, with paid by parents education. On top of it, baby boomers are retiring in droves, the problem is that millennials don't want these old stinky jobs.
And for many, there is good service and cosy atmosphere in mama's basement to even think about leaving.

lol I'm actually doing pretty Ok--but some of my peers aren't and that distresses me a bit because I know that they are hard working but stressed out and demoralized because they aren't advancing as quickly as they thought or as they should be due to an lagging economy that isn't our fault. It is factually harder to make it these days. Baby boomers could buy a house by working a 9-5 while still in their twenties! lol I wish I could work a 9-5 and do that! Maybe soon, but not yet. Are there those amongst us who've become complacent and lazy? Sure. But don't forget that many of us grew up/stepped out into the world during one of the worst economic recessions in history.

And a good number of millennials have to still live at home because the cost of living has gone way up without there being the necessary jobs and salaries to live off of. It is not fun bringing dates back to your parent's house. lol And c'mon, a fully furnished basement can get really comfy and hard to leave! lol

Perhaps if millennials could stop texting for a moment, they could have had work done and made better money.

Lol I work with a few baby boomers who still type on computers with one finger! We type 20x their speed, with one hand. :laughing: But they get paid 6 figures!

What an attitude. Millennials want to make same money for same position as boomers with 30 year experience. I think the good meaning of Equality got lost in millennial's greed.

Lol I do think that experience is valuable and should be factored into salary but why should you get paid so much more than me when I can do both my job and your job? And quicker? And cheaper? :grin:

Total blindness. We protected you, our millennial kids, with so much love to the point of handicapping you. I'm sorry for this. We gave you so much and pampered you so well, then when you left the house, the world seems tough and cruel in comparison. Well, get used to it, it is a real world, stop complaining and make it better.

We should start slapping you around the way our parents did in crowded small houses with 10 siblings fighting for every square inch and piece of dry bread. So when you leave this shithole and sniff "same old cruel world" it will feel like a paradise to you. Whahahahahahahahaha.

Of course, I hope, you were reading this like a good satire of millennials, and good humor. ;) I wouldn't dare harming our sweet kids. You are so adorable and cute...

LOL Thanks for pouring on the guilt! :laughing: I did actually grow up with a lot of love and shelter, which I feel very fortunate for. Both of my parents were parented by WWII survivors with varying manifestations of PTSD. I know that had a profound effect on how they raised me--the good thing is, they went against their upbringing and decided to show a lot of tenderness, understanding, and openness towards me. I'm not saying that things are the absolute worst for millennials! But I don't think that it should be overlooked or ignored that the times we live in are not easy--we have a brand of issues and problems unique to us. That's all. :smile:
 
I'm technically not a millennial (I was born after 1995) so I'm even worse. My generation will be the most selfish, most entitled brats in the history of humanity. Hopefully it can't get much worse than this.
 
I'm technically not a millennial (I was born after 1995) so I'm even worse. My generation will be the most selfish, most entitled brats in the history of humanity. Hopefully it can't get much worse than this.

Lol You are too young to be so pessimistic. Where is your hope???
 
I'm technically not a millennial (I was born after 1995) so I'm even worse. My generation will be the most selfish, most entitled brats in the history of humanity. Hopefully it can't get much worse than this.
Wait till new generation, around year 2030 grows up with domestic robots doing all house chores for them, and building new big houses for them. Automatic planes and cars will whisk them around the globe to visit places and to have endless fun, and they will collect helicopter money for doing virtually nothing, for just existing. We'll see the first true entitlement generation.
 
As vocal as the Left is about social and socioeconomic issues, it loves minorityism more than ever. But even minorityism is not universally practiced by left intellectuals and demagogues. Minorityism becomes particularly important when religious minorities are the subject matter. And if the religion is Islam, you dare not raise your voice.
Yes, it’s incredible how the modern Left dramatically loses its courage when some tenets of Islam on which terrorists base their actions, are questioned. The debate immediately devolves into allegations of racism (never mind that Islam is not a race, it’s a religion).
Racism is a well-used word here. It shuts down the conversation because racism is such a taboo especially in western societies now. Unfortunately, the common public seems to readily swallow the idea that a people equal their religion - which is to say that human beings are indistinguishable from the ideology they might espouse. This conflation of people with faith is devastating to constructive discussion. No one stops to think that human beings are not ideas themselves - or that ideas are not human beings.
So then we are sold the meme of 'Islamophobia' - a word which (again) conflates criticism of modern Islam with anti-Muslim hatred. It is true that the latter exists in all modern societies and is a social problem. But even if you mistakenly term 'terrorism’ as 'Islamic terrorism’, the liberals pounce on you, calling you a racist and a bigot who hates Muslims.
http://www.dnaindia.com/world/stand...are-destroying-the-idea-of-liberalism-2131514
The liberals and the Leftists, who were originally meant to be the great emancipators, rationalists and freethinkers, who were to stand up against backwardness and religious extremism, who were supposed to be the vanguards of scientific and material progress, have now abandoned their post in the name of minorityism. Their bigotry is matched only by their visceral opponents on the Right. The only difference between the Left and the Right now seems to be that the Right is aggressive and openly racist, xenophobic, homophobic, bigoted and sexist, while the Left is hypocritical, cowardly and uses obscurantism and cultural relativism to achieve its ends. The ends though, have become quite similar.
 
Leftist Billionaire admits national borders are the “obstacle” he is fighting against

https://www.intellihub.com/liberal-...-national-borders-flood-europe-with-refugees/

“Our plan treats the protection of refugees as the objective and national borders as the obstacle.”

While some commentators have noted the ties between the ongoing European refugee crisis and the Soros run Open Society Foundation, the mainstream media as a whole has largely downplayed this connection, instead opting to shame the people of Europe and the United States into supporting what amounts to the literal destruction of their society.
Now, as multiple European countries have begun to fight back against this wholesale assault on their countries very foundation, Soros and his groups have come under attack and their response to these attacks has revealed why exactly he is funding various groups helping to facilitate the introduction of hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of Muslim “refugees”.
Hint. It has little to do with saving people fleeing war-torn countries.
 
@LeBrok,
Brilliant. Speak for yourself, though, as far as still finding them cute. :) Even though I love them dearly, I'm getting tired of cooking, and I'm tired of the drama of their love lives.

@Dinarid,
Even my children say the group currently in high school is even worse in every way.

@Wanderlust,
This generation in the U.S. is not living through the Great Depression, or being sent off to war, or forced to immigrate to a country where they don't speak the language well if at all, and don't know how things work. It's not anyone else's fault if many of them chose to major in disciplines that don't fit them for an actual JOB. My advice to them would be: stop getting high and drinking too much, get off your duffs, off the phone, take a job even if you think it's beneath you, and make something of it, or find something that people want and either make it or provide it. STOP COMPLAINING. A nice apartment, a new car, all the latest electronics, take out food every night of the week, and week-ends away are not your birthright. We worked for those things, earned them; do the same. It might also help if they actually were willing to commit to one another and would stop perpetually playing the field. The pooling of resources is only one and among the least of the benefits of a committed relationship. If they keep it up they're either going to wind up alone or become one of those undignified and depressing middle aged, or older, "players". There's nothing attractive about it, believe me.

As for your comments about religion in America I find it rather, forgive me, superficial, and also strangely dated. The Ku Klux Klan? Even if you could classify it as a "fundamentalist Christian" group, my children barely remember what it was, knowing it only from history class. That was part of my world growing up, not theirs. The people who were active in it are moribund in their wheelchairs or hobbling about with their walkers. That extreme sect you mention? What percentage are churches like that of the total church going American public, even the fundamentalist Protestant portion of that population? It seems as if it's been a long, long time since you listened to any sermons. It's as if you've time jumped from the late 60s and 70s to the present.

There is, I repeat, absolutely no comparison between what is taught in Christian schools, Protestant or Catholic, in this country, and what is taught in madrasas. As for equating skepticism about the extent of man created climate change and what to do about it with a hate crime or jihadism, you're going off a cliff there. That's not worthy of debating.

As for what is actionable, you might want to review the conspiracy laws on the books. One act taken in furtherance of a criminal conspiracy is sufficient, and preaching that this society is evil and should be destroyed would qualify.
 
@LeBrok,
Brilliant. Speak for yourself, though, as far as still finding them cute. :) Even though I love them dearly, I'm getting tired of cooking, and I'm tired of the drama of their love lives.
I can't relate to cooking for them, as I had two left hands for it, but surely to their love lives debacles. I'm sure, I could find better matching mates for them. Let's go back to arranged marriages, shall we? lol Finding someone for dating, fun and sex is not that same as finding a good partner for life. I'm not sure when they are going to finally get that, if at all.
That's it, rant over, I'm going to bed.
 
This is so surreal...I feel like im standing in front of a squirrel riding a tiny bicycle while speaking to me in spanish. As a millenial myself I cannot believe all the bashing against my generation that is going on in this thread. I would never want to rely on assistance and would much prefer to make my own money, and this is coming from a dude who grew up cheering after watching bowser plummet to his doom in Mario 3.
Everyone who posted in this thread is awesome but some people need to change their point of view.
 
Back
Top