Jovialis
Advisor
- Messages
- 9,888
- Reaction score
- 6,794
- Points
- 113
- Ethnic group
- Italian
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- R1b-PF7566>Y227216
- mtDNA haplogroup
- H6a1b7
Thanks Jovialis, …. and Happy Columbus DayBig thank you @Salento for making this possible, I have converted it to Eigenstrat, and merged it with AADR, here's a model in qpAdm. This is pretty amazing, we were able to provide this before the paper was even published!
View attachment 18823
You as well!Thanks Jovialis, …. and Happy Columbus Day![]()
Indo-European Italic and Hellenic peoples.Southern Italians in the Middle Bronze Age can be modeled with Neolithic Italian Ancestry + excess non-steppe Iranian related ancestry.
This is similar to the dynamic seen in Minoans, but instead of Greece_N + Iran_N, the Roca_Vecchia_MBA can be modeled Italy_N + Iran_N
View attachment 18824
The excess-Iran_N was indirectly brought by intermediaries from Anatolia and South Eastern Europe in the later stage of the Neolithic onwards. The established archeological and genetic evidence are aligned in confirming that.Ganj Dareh is near to Masbi Rural District in Abdanan County in Iran: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masbi_Rural_District Herodotus has mentioned Maspians as one of major Indo-European peoples in the west of Iran, their name is similar to Messapians in Apulia.
Etymology of Messapii: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Μεσσάπιος#Ancient_Greek "According to Pokorny, the Messapic name means "amid waters," from Proto-Indo-European *médʰyos + *h₂ep-, the latter of which gave their region Apulia." Abdanan in Persian means the same.
View attachment 18837
These are just some similar Indo-European names. It is clear that there was no direct migration from Ganj Dareh to Italy but there could be cultural similarities between these two IE regions.The excess-Iran_N was indirectly brought by intermediaries from Anatolia and South Eastern Europe in the later stage of the Neolithic onwards. The established archeological and genetic evidence are aligned in confirming that.
I'm guessing this sample is abnormal for Apulia/S. Italy as far as how much Caucasian input it has for the MBA, but it serves as evidence to show that there was contact and genetic exchange with the Greek world in Southern Italy during this period. Is it perhaps plausible that this person was directly from Greece? It seems the study abstract believes otherwise, but 19.3% for an Iran_N like pull of ancestry (probably caucasian in reality) is significant.Modeling Apulia_MBA as well as modeling myself with Apulia_MBA:
View attachment 18832
View attachment 18833
View attachment 18834
I'm guessing this sample is abnormal for Apulia/S. Italy as far as how much Caucasian input it has for the MBA, but it serves as evidence to show that there was contact and genetic exchange with the Greek world in Southern Italy during this period. Is it perhaps plausible that this person was directly from Greece? It seems the study abstract believes otherwise, but 19.3% for an Iran_N like pull of ancestry (probably caucasian in reality) is significant.
The actual amount of genetic turnover in southern Italy is definitely much higher than 19,3% because there was no "pure" Iran_N anywhere in the MBA.I'm guessing this sample is abnormal for Apulia/S. Italy as far as how much Caucasian input it has for the MBA, but it serves as evidence to show that there was contact and genetic exchange with the Greek world in Southern Italy during this period. Is it perhaps plausible that this person was directly from Greece? It seems the study abstract believes otherwise, but 19.3% for an Iran_N like pull of ancestry (probably caucasian in reality) is significant.
Why? BTW it is not "Italy_MBA", it is Roca_Vecchia_MBA.It is clear that when it is said that Italy_MBA = Italy_N + Iran_N and Greece_MBA = Greece_N + Iran_N, Iran_N didn't come to Italy from Greece.
Because it doesn't say Roca_Vecchia_MBA = Italy_N + Iran_N + Greece_MBA.Why? BTW it is not "Italy_MBA", it is Roca_Vecchia_MBA.
I agree that there was definitely no pure Iran_N arrival in Italy, and that a large amount of EEF dna in this sample is unlikely to have a specifically Italian Neolithic origin, but I question as to how common this sample profile was even in S. Italy by the MBA. That's not to say there aren't more like this, nor to reject the idea of bronze age genetic exchange with the Greek world - I've been suggesting longstanding genetic continuity in S. Italy with the Aegean for at least 6 years now.The actual amount of genetic turnover in southern Italy is definitely much higher than 19,3% because there was no "pure" Iran_N anywhere in the MBA.
Roca Vec
I guess the total lack of EHG ancestry makes them much less modern shifted than I had originally assumed. Thanks for the PCA.