• Don't want to see ads? Install an adblocker like uBlock Origin or use a Europe-based privacy-friendly browser like Vivaldi or Mullvad.

Genetic study Ancient DNA reveals pervasive directional selection across West Eurasia

Tautalus

Regular Member
Messages
580
Reaction score
1,482
Points
93
Ethnic group
Portuguese
Y-DNA haplogroup
I2-M223 / I-FTB15368
mtDNA haplogroup
H6a1b2y
This paper investigates how natural selection has shaped human genetic variation over the last ~18,000 years by analysing a very large dataset of ancient genomes. The authors compile and analyse genetic data from 15,836 individuals, including more than 10,000 newly sequenced ancient samples, alongside modern genomes, making this one of the most comprehensive temporal datasets ever assembled for studying human evolution. The central goal is to directly detect directional selection, meaning consistent increases or decreases in allele frequencies over time, rather than inferring selection indirectly from present day genetic patterns.
To achieve this, the authors introduce a new statistical method designed to identify directional selection in time series genetic data. Instead of relying on comparisons between populations that can be confounded by migration or population structure, their method tests whether allele frequencies change consistently with time after accounting for genetic similarity between individuals. This allows them to distinguish true selection from changes caused by admixture, drift, or demographic history. They further increase power by imputing missing genetic data, applying extensive quality control, and analyzing millions of variants across the genome. Because standard statistical assumptions do not hold in this context, they calibrate their test using enrichment of genome wide association study (GWAS) signals and simulations, ensuring that detected signals are likely to reflect genuine selection rather than artefacts.
Using this framework, the study finds that directional selection has been widespread and strong in West Eurasia over the last 10,000 years, identifying 479 independent loci with very high confidence and thousands more with weaker evidence. This is a striking contrast to earlier views that strong selection was rare in recent human history. The estimated selection coefficients are often on the order of 0.5% or higher, which is substantial in evolutionary terms. The authors show that these signals are robust through multiple lines of evidence, including enrichment for GWAS associated variants and characteristic patterns in surrounding haplotypes.
The traits most strongly affected by selection are those related to immune function, metabolism, and environmental adaptation. Immune related genes show particularly strong and consistent signals, likely reflecting adaptation to changing pathogen environments as human populations grew, adopted agriculture, and lived in closer proximity to domesticated animals. The study also finds strong selection on genes affecting skin pigmentation, with multiple loci contributing to the evolution of lighter skin in West Eurasia. These changes occurred largely after the adoption of farming and are plausibly linked to reduced sunlight exposure and dietary shifts affecting vitamin D synthesis.
In addition to single gene effects, the authors examine polygenic adaptation, where many genes with small effects collectively influence complex traits. By combining their selection estimates with GWAS data for hundreds of traits, they test whether groups of alleles associated with particular phenotypes have shifted in a coordinated way over time. They find evidence that genetic predictors of traits such as body fat, cardio-metabolic risk, smoking behavior, and some psychiatric conditions have changed directionally, often in ways consistent with improved health outcomes in modern environments. They also detect signals suggesting increases in genetic predictors of traits related to cognitive performance, education, and socioeconomic outcomes, although they emphasize that these modern phenotypes may not correspond directly to traits under selection in ancient populations.
A key insight of the study is that human evolution has been highly dynamic and context-dependent, with selection pressures changing over time and sometimes reversing direction. Several specific genetic examples illustrate this complexity. For instance, alleles in immune genes that today increase risk for autoimmune diseases were positively selected in the past, likely because they conferred protection against infections. Other loci show clear reversals, where an allele was initially favored and later selected against as environments changed. The study also revisits well known hypotheses about particular genes, confirming some (such as selection on pigmentation genes) while rejecting others (such as strong directional selection on the cystic fibrosis allele).
Despite its strengths, the study acknowledges important limitations. Interpretation of polygenic signals is particularly challenging because GWAS effect sizes are derived from modern populations and environments, which may differ greatly from ancient conditions. Additionally, although the method attempts to control for population structure, residual confounding cannot be entirely ruled out. The assumption of constant selection coefficients over time is also a simplification, given evidence that selection pressures often fluctuate.
Overall, the study provides strong evidence that recent human evolution in West Eurasia involved widespread, ongoing directional selection affecting hundreds of genetic variants and many biological systems. It shifts the perspective from rare, dramatic selective sweeps to a more complex picture in which adaptation is often polygenic, temporally variable, and closely tied to cultural and environmental changes such as agriculture, diet, and disease exposure.
Abstract
Ancient DNA has transformed our understanding of population history, but its potential to reveal as much about human evolutionary biology has not been realized because of limited sample sizes and the difficulty of distinguishing sustained rises in allele frequency increasing fitness—directional selection—from shifts due to migrations, population structure, or non-adaptive purifying or stabilizing selection. Here we present a method for detecting directional selection in ancient DNA time-series data that tests for consistent trends in allele frequency change over time, and apply it to 15,836 West Eurasians (10,016 with new data). Previous work has shown that classic hard sweeps driving advantageous mutations to fixation have been rare over the broad span of human evolution. By contrast, in the past ten millennia, we find that many hundreds of alleles have been affected by strong directional selection. We also document one-standard-deviation changes on the scale of modern variation in combinations of alleles that today predict complex traits. This includes decreases in predicted body fat and schizophrenia, and increases in measures of cognitive performance. These effects were measured in industrialized societies, and it remains unclear how these relate to phenotypes that were adaptive in the past. We estimate selection coefficients at 9.7 million variants, enabling study of how Darwinian forces couple to allelic effects and shape the genetic architecture of complex traits.

Behind a paywall​

Pdf from David Reich Lab

Article in Science Magazine​

Gallery of single-variant allele frequency trajectories
L4ku331.png


Signals of directional polygenic selection.

P9pp53W.png
 
Last edited:
This video features an in-depth discussion with David Reich about the findings of the paper. He elaborates on recent breakthroughs in understanding natural selection and human adaptation over the last 18,000 years through unprecedentedly large ancient DNA datasets, particularly from Europe and the Middle East. The conversation explores how genetic data reveals intense biological adaptation during the Bronze Age, challenges prior assumptions about the quiescence of natural selection, and offers new perspectives on archaic human relationships.

Key Insights
• Natural selection has been far more active in recent human history than previously believed, especially in the last 5,000 years, coinciding with the Bronze Age and intensification of farming, higher population densities, and closer contact with domesticated animals.
• Previous studies suggested natural selection was quiescent over hundreds of thousands of years, largely due to limited sample sizes and the confounding effects of population migration and admixture.
• Reich’s lab capitalised on a massive increase in ancient DNA samples (about 16,000 individuals, plus modern genomes) and developed novel statistical methods to separate signals of natural selection from genetic drift and population structure.
• They identified thousands of genetic loci (about 3,800 with 50% confidence, and hundreds with >99% confidence) under directional selection over the last 10,000 years, a dramatic increase from earlier studies detecting only a few dozen.
• Immune and metabolic traits show the strongest signals of selection, with a four to five-fold enrichment of selection signals in immune-related genes. Selection on behavioural and psychiatric traits is weaker and more diffuse, likely due to polygenic architecture involving many genes of small effect.
• The Bronze Age (5,000 years ago) emerges as a critical period of accelerated selection across a variety of traits, including lactase persistence (milk digestion), fatty acid metabolism (FADS1/2 variants), pigmentation (depigmentation in Europeans), and disease-related variants such as TYK2 (tuberculosis risk) and hemochromatosis.
• The intensified selection during the Bronze Age likely reflects an evolutionary mismatch as genomes adapted to new environments characterised by agriculture, urbanisation, and novel pathogen landscapes.
• Selection signals also appear on complex traits linked to cognitive performance and years of schooling, with evidence of strong selection during the Bronze Age but little detectable selection in the last 2,000 years.
• Genetic predictors of traits such as years of schooling correlate strongly across populations as distant as Europeans and Chinese, supporting the robustness of these selection signals.
• The study highlights the impact of migration and admixture, which obscures detection of selection but also shapes genetic variation profoundly. For example, shifts in cognitive trait predictors often reflect population replacement rather than selection per se.
• Reich discusses an alternative model of archaic human relationships, proposing that Neanderthals and modern humans share cultural and genetic admixture events dating 200,000–300,000 years ago, involving expansions of populations bearing Middle Stone Age technology (Levallois tools). This challenges conventional views that strictly separate Neanderthals and Denisovans as sister groups.
• There is no evidence for “fixed” genetic differences responsible for behavioural modernity around 50,000 years ago, suggesting culture and polygenic adaptation rather than major selective sweeps drove the cognitive revolution.
• The research underscores the importance of large sample sizes, novel computational methods, and interdisciplinary data (archaeology, genetics, climate science) in resolving human evolutionary history and adaptation.

Timeline of Major Evolutionary and Genetic Events
Time PeriodEvent/Insight
300,000–200,000 years agoProposed admixture between modern humans and archaic populations related to Neanderthals (5% DNA)
100,000–50,000 years agoEmergence of behavioural modernity; no fixed selective sweeps detected; culture accelerates
18,000 years agoStart of detailed ancient DNA data coverage; low natural selection signals detected initially
10,000 years agoBeginning of farming/agriculture expansion in Europe and Middle East
5,000 years agoBronze Age: accelerated natural selection in immune, metabolic, pigmentation, and cognitive traits
Last 2,000 yearsLittle detectable directional natural selection on cognitive/behavioural traits despite societal complexity
Last 300 yearsNo detectable natural selection in African American genomes despite environmental shifts
Major Traits Under Selection

Trait CategorySelection Pattern and Notes
Immune SystemStrongest enrichment; rapid allele frequency changes during Bronze Age reflecting pathogen pressures and population density
Metabolic TraitsSelection against obesity and type 2 diabetes risk; linked to shift from hunter-gatherer to farming diets
PigmentationDepigmentation alleles increased in frequency mainly 4,000–2,000 years ago in Europeans
Lactase PersistenceIncreased during Bronze Age due to dairy farming and cattle domestication
Behavioural/PsychiatricWeaker signals due to polygenic architecture; still under selection but with many small-effect variants
Cognitive Performance/Years of SchoolingStrong selection during Bronze Age; correlated across distant populations; complex trait with pleiotropic (a single gene or genetic variant influences multiple phenotypic traits) correlations

Methodological Innovations
• Use of large-scale ancient DNA datasets (approx. 16,000 ancient individuals plus 6,000 modern genomes).
• Development of a statistical model using genetic relatedness matrices to control for population structure, drift, and admixture.
• Identification of selection signals by testing whether allele frequency changes over time are better explained by directional selection rather than neutral factors.
• Validation through correlation with genome-wide association studies (GWAS) from large modern cohorts, confirming that selected loci affect known traits.
• In-solution DNA enrichment techniques to economically sequence low-concentration ancient samples, dramatically increasing data yield.
Core Concepts
• Directional natural selection: Systematic increase or decrease in allele frequency over time due to adaptive advantage.
• Genetic drift: Random fluctuations in allele frequencies due to chance in finite populations.
• Population admixture: Mixing between genetically distinct groups, causing large shifts in allele frequencies.
• Evolutionary mismatch: Genetic traits adapted to ancestral environments that become maladaptive in new environments.
• Polygenic traits: Traits influenced by many genes, each contributing a small effect.
• Levallois technology: Mode of stone tool manufacture linked to behavioural and cognitive changes in Middle Stone Age/ Paleolithic.

Important Quantitative Findings
Statistic/MeasureValue/Result
Ancient DNA samples analysed~16,000 ancient individuals
Total genomes in dataset (ancient + modern)~22,000 individuals
Positions in genome analysed~10 million variable positions
Positions with >99% confidence under selection479
Positions with ~50% confidence under selection~3,800
Enrichment of selection signals in immune traits4-5 fold increase compared to genome-wide baseline
Selection coefficients for many variantsOften ≥1% per generation (strong selection)
Selection on cognitive traits during Bronze AgeUp to 2 standard deviations shift over 2,000 years
Time of strongest selection on pigmentation traits4,000–2,000 years ago

Conclusions
• The Bronze Age represents a pivotal period of intensified natural selection in human populations of Europe and the Middle East, driven by drastic environmental and cultural changes.
• Large-scale genomic data and improved methods now allow detection of thousands of adaptive loci, revealing a genome "vibrating" with selection rather than being quiescent.
• Selection is strongest on immune and metabolic traits but also affects behavioural and cognitive traits, though the latter are more polygenic and diffuse.
• The study challenges simplified narratives of human evolution, emphasising complex admixture, population dynamics, and the interplay between culture and genetics.
• The research highlights a rich reservoir of genetic variation in ancestral human populations that enables rapid adaptation to new environments.
• Archaic human relationships may be more complex than previously thought, with cultural and genetic admixture shaping Neanderthals and modern humans.
• These insights refine our understanding of how humans have biologically responded to cultural revolutions such as farming, urbanisation, and social complexity.​

 
Last edited:
Back
Top