• Don't want to see ads? Install an adblocker like uBlock Origin or use a Europe-based privacy-friendly browser like Vivaldi or Mullvad.

The Coming of the Anglo-Saxons to Britain

Reich is top of his game
He can be wrong but chance he does
Is extremely low.
Personally for me i don't care at all
If this EAS003 outlier individual carried 30% african
Autosomally speaking
It will not change my life and other people life
 
There some english people belong a mtDNA L1b and L2( maybe have ancestry black people ) and E-M2
 
England Kent Polhill POH003 700 65,15% 51.239837, 0.66428 M R1b1a1b1a1a1c / S263 / R1b1a1b1a1a1c2a1d2 / DF94 H11a2a
I'm a carrier of Haplogroup R-DF94 (According to FTdna), Problem is that I have (from what I know) have only Celtic ancestors from Southern France, but from what I understand here, R-DF94 (Present in the Polhill 3 sample) is Germanic, I know that I have some connection to Germanic groups, due to several PCA analytics, could anyone explain how this is possible and if R-DF94 is truly a Germanic haplogroup?
 
interesting
look to be the relevant papers for this EAS003 lady
are publish (y)

the 2 individuals who carried some west African ancestry autosomal speaking :

Kent- grave 47- EAS003-female


Dorest-worth matravers- grave 1633b-KD010/I11570-male under e-m78
(likely his y haplogroup from north Africa not west Africa)



sources:


 
interesting
look to be the relevant papers for this EAS003 lady
are publish (y)

the 2 individuals who carried some west African ancestry autosomal speaking :

Kent- grave 47- EAS003-female


Dorest-worth matravers- grave 1633b-KD010/I11570-male under e-m78
(likely his y haplogroup from north Africa not west Africa)



sources:



Grave no. 52 is E-V13

This suggests that the woman in grave 45 is a maternal aunt of the female in grave 47 (Figure 3). The male in grave 52 carries the Y chromosome haplogroup E-V13, which is unusual in northern Europe and more characteristic of southern Italy, the Balkans and Greece (Cruciani et al. Reference Cruciani2007), but neither he, nor his daughter (grave 34) or granddaughter (grave 45), exhibits any measurable sub-Saharan African ancestry
 
Grave no. 52 is E-V13

yes he is at ftdna discover:
1755266826597.png



also I11570 the e-m78 individual ( who supposed to carry some west African DNA autosomal )
appear at ftdna discover:
1755266939313.png
 
Funny that they still write about E-V13 being exceptional in a way which isn't justified based on the available data. It is of course not as common as say R-M269, that's obvious, but if looking at the age of the branches, main E-V13 branches are fairly common throughout much of Europe compared to similarly old branches. Especially in Central Europe, from where many Anglo-Saxons-Jutes-Franks came from.
The real question at this point is how much of the E-V13 came in the post-Roman vs. Roman period to Britain.
 
Back
Top