Ethics Is it better to set your own moral rules than to follow religious ones?

Maciamo

Veteran member
Admin
Messages
10,093
Reaction score
3,530
Points
113
Location
Lothier
Ethnic group
Italo-celto-germanic
I grew up with a Catholic education and began catechism lessons at the age of six. From an early age, I had a keen interest in reasoning and logic, especially when applied to moral rules. This led me to quickly identify what I saw as flaws in the moral system being taught to me.

Throughout my schooling, religion lessons—which were primarily focused on Catholicism rather than providing a neutral discussion about world religions—often turned into debates between my teacher and me. A recurring point of contention was whether people are better off thinking for themselves and determining what behavior is moral and how to be a good person, or whether they should follow moral rules blindly, even if it sometimes results in harm.

I have asked ChatGPT to give me some examples of moral commands from the Bible that are often viewed as outdated or irrelevant in modern society. These commands were contextually rooted in the cultures and circumstances of their times.

1. **Death Penalty for Rebellious Children**: Deuteronomy 21:18-21 prescribes the death penalty for a stubborn and rebellious son. Modern societies favor rehabilitation and counseling over such extreme measures.

2. **Sabbath Observance**: The strict observance of the Sabbath (Exodus 20:8-11) is less rigidly followed in contemporary society, especially among Christians. While the principle of rest is valued, the specific prohibitions against work are often interpreted more flexibly.

3. **Punishments for Crimes**: The Old Testament prescribes severe punishments for various offenses, including stoning for adultery (Leviticus 20:10) and blasphemy (Leviticus 24:16). These practices are not followed in modern legal systems and are generally viewed as incompatible with contemporary human rights standards.

4. **Slavery Regulations**: The Bible includes regulations for the treatment of slaves (Exodus 21:2-11, Ephesians 6:5-9). Hebrews could enslave other Hebrews for up to six years, and were to be released in the seventh year (Exodus 21:2-6, Deuteronomy 15:12-15). Foreigners could be enslaved indefinitely and were often considered property that could be inherited (Leviticus 25:44-46). Modern society widely condemns slavery in any form, and these biblical commands are often seen as outdated.

5. **Gender Roles and Conduct**: Certain New Testament passages prescribe specific roles and behaviors for women, such as 1 Timothy 2:12, which says women should not teach or have authority over men. These instructions are controversial today and often conflict with contemporary views on gender equality.

6. **Mixed Fabric Clothing**: Leviticus 19:19 forbids wearing garments made of mixed fabrics. This command is generally disregarded today, as modern textile practices commonly involve blended materials.

7. **Prohibition on Tattoos**: Leviticus 19:28 prohibits tattooing, stating, "Do not cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo marks on yourselves." Many people today view tattoos as a form of personal expression and art, and this prohibition is often not followed.

8. **Menstruation and Purity Laws**: Leviticus 15:19-30 describes detailed laws regarding a woman's menstruation and the need for purification. These regulations are generally not observed in modern contexts, where menstruation is understood as a natural biological process.

9. **Prohibition Against Mixing Crops**: Leviticus 19:19 also forbids planting two kinds of seed in the same field. Modern agricultural practices often involve crop rotation and intercropping, which are seen as beneficial for soil health and yield.

10. **Grooming and Haircuts**: Leviticus 19:27 commands, "Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard." This command is rarely followed today, as grooming styles have significantly evolved.

11. **Homosexuality**: Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 prohibit homosexual acts. Contemporary views on LGBTQ+ rights and relationships often conflict with these passages, leading to significant debate within religious and secular communities.

12. **Vows and Oaths**: Matthew 5:34-37 advises against taking oaths, instead encouraging honesty without swearing by anything. Modern legal and social practices often involve oaths and affirmations, such as in courtrooms.

13. **Head Coverings for Women**: 1 Corinthians 11:5-6 instructs women to cover their heads while praying or prophesying. This practice is not widely observed in many Christian denominations today.

14. **Foot Washing**: John 13:14-15 describes Jesus washing his disciples' feet and instructing them to do the same for one another. While some Christian communities practice foot washing as a symbolic act, it is not a common practice in most modern settings.

15. **Divorce Restrictions**: Matthew 19:9 and other passages in the New Testament restrict divorce except in cases of sexual immorality. Contemporary attitudes towards divorce are often more lenient, recognizing various grounds for the dissolution of marriage.

16. **Banishment of People with Skin Diseases**: Leviticus 13:45-46 describes how individuals with certain skin conditions must live outside the camp and call out "Unclean! Unclean!" Modern medicine treats skin diseases without such social exclusion.

These moral rules clash so much with modern lifestyle and society that if Christians were to follow them all they would likely be seen in a similar light as Muslims who cannot integrate into Western societies today.

Here are some examples of commands from the Quran that may be seen as less applicable or relevant in modern society, similar to the biblical examples provided earlier:

1. **Punishments for Theft**: The Quran prescribes specific punishments for theft, such as the amputation of a hand (Surah Al-Ma'idah 5:38). Modern legal systems generally do not adopt such severe physical punishments, opting instead for imprisonment and rehabilitation.

2. **Inheritance Laws**: The Quran lays out detailed inheritance laws (Surah An-Nisa 4:11-12) that specify different shares for male and female heirs. Contemporary views on gender equality often challenge these prescribed distributions.

3. **Slavery**: The Quran acknowledges and regulates slavery (Surah An-Nisa 4:3, Surah An-Nur 24:33). While it encourages the humane treatment of slaves and their eventual emancipation, modern society condemns slavery in any form.

4. **Testimony and Witnesses**: In legal matters, the Quran states that the testimony of two women is equivalent to that of one man (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:282). This principle is often seen as incompatible with modern notions of gender equality in legal proceedings.

5. **Dress Code for Women**: The Quran instructs women to dress modestly and cover certain parts of their bodies (Surah An-Nur 24:31, Surah Al-Ahzab 33:59). While modesty is still valued, the specific interpretation and enforcement of these guidelines vary widely in contemporary Muslim societies.

6. **Polygamy**: The Quran permits a man to marry up to four women, provided he can treat them all fairly (Surah An-Nisa 4:3). This practice is less common today and is often subject to legal and social restrictions in many countries.

7. **Dietary Laws**: The Quran prohibits the consumption of certain foods, such as pork and alcohol (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:173, Surah Al-Ma'idah 5:90). While many Muslims continue to observe these dietary restrictions, others may not adhere to them as strictly in modern, multicultural contexts.

8. **Physical Punishments for Adultery**: The Quran prescribes lashes for adulterers (Surah An-Nur 24:2). Modern legal systems typically do not employ physical punishments for adultery, favoring fines, imprisonment, or other forms of legal recourse.

9. **Marriage to Captives**: The Quran allows for marriage to female captives of war (Surah An-Nisa 4:24). This concept is generally viewed as outdated and inappropriate in contemporary international human rights discourse.

10. **Restrictions on Interest (Riba)**: The Quran explicitly prohibits usury (charging excessive interest) (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:275-279). While the principle of avoiding exploitative financial practices is still valued, the prohibition of any form of interest presents challenges in modern banking and finance systems.

These examples highlight how some commands in the Quran, much like those in the Bible, can be viewed as contextually bound to the historical and cultural circumstances of their times, and may be interpreted differently or seen as less relevant in the context of modern society.

I personally like what Immanuel Kant has to say about morality. In short, for Kant the most important moral value is good will. People shouldn't follow rules just because they fear the consequences of not following them. It's not fear of punishment that should motivate good behaviour. Good actions should come from the goodness of your heart and the desire to do good. Kant also says that we shouldn't treat other people as a means to an end.

Here is a summary of its key elements:

1. **Good Will**: Kant argues that the only thing that is good without qualification is a good will. A good will is characterized by acting out of a sense of moral duty rather than from inclinations or consequences.

2. **Duty and Moral Law**: According to Kant, moral actions are those performed out of a sense of duty in accordance with a universal moral law, which he calls the "categorical imperative." This law is binding on all rational beings, irrespective of their desires or interests.

3. **Categorical Imperative**: Kant's categorical imperative is a fundamental principle that dictates that one should act only according to maxims that one can will to become universal laws. This means that before taking any action, one should consider whether the principle behind the action could be adopted universally without contradiction.

- **First Formulation**: "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."
- **Second Formulation**: "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This emphasizes the inherent dignity and worth of all individuals.

4. **Autonomy and Rationality**: Kant places great importance on autonomy, the ability to govern oneself according to rational principles. He believes that moral agents must be autonomous and capable of making rational decisions based on the categorical imperative.

5. **Moral Worth**: For Kant, the moral worth of an action lies not in its consequences but in the intention or motivation behind it. An action has moral worth if it is done from duty and in accordance with the categorical imperative.

6. **Kingdom of Ends**: Kant envisions a hypothetical "kingdom of ends" in which all individuals act according to the principles of the categorical imperative, treating each other as ends in themselves and not merely as means to an end. This represents an ideal moral community where rational beings coexist harmoniously.

Kant's moral philosophy is rigorous and places a strong emphasis on the role of rationality and universality in ethical decision-making.

Here is a video that summarises Kant's ethics.

 
Last edited:
Although I am an atheist, I have only one rule and its corollary: Don't do to others what you don't want them to do to you, and do to others what you do want them to do to you.

The first part is basically says do no harm, the second is help others and improve your community.
 

This thread has been viewed 294 times.

Back
Top