It seems this way to me too, but many prefer to explain the composition of the historical DNA of Italians and the genetic barriers present between the various areas of Italy with the genetic contribution deriving from intense migratory movements at different times in the last 2500/3000 years...
so how much reliable can this reddit post be?
https://www.reddit.com/r/23andme/s/qV6lLM5Br3
also today another Italian (Sicilian) result was posted and the comments are the usual clichés https://www.reddit.com/r/23andme/s/6C3E8dtji7
this is the reason why I'm doing this thread, I've been part of those subreddits for a year now and I see a handful of users who, also looking at the log of their activity comments, seem only interested in classifying and making others understand how Italians are... not white Europeans but that...
yes, the Italian category in 23ndme has central Italy as its reference so it is logical that a Tuscan scores 95%> Italian. I also saw Sicilians scoring almost completely Italian while some published results reached 25% of Western Asia and North Africa. so I was asking for general clarification...
Hi everyone, I've been passionate about archaeogenetics and population DNA for some time now and I've been on Reddit for a while, so I'd like to make this post to seek clarification that I can't find there in a uniform and coherent way. several times, regarding the genetics and DNA of the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.