Search results

North_Atlantic 25.01 East_Med 23.01 West_Md 20.82 Baltic 17.84

My results are here. Roman (8.838) Galician + Roman (9.745) Galician + Samnite (11.42) Galician + Gallo-Roman (11.48) Illyrian (13.39) Galician + Illyrian (14.31) Galician (15.08) Gallo-Roman (15.24) Samnite (16.16)

Did not bought their Y-DNA and mtDNA analysis, as I already got it from yfull, but their ethnicity estimator was literally the only one that assigned me some eastern European (about 8-9%). All other tests assessed me as about either 0-1% eastern Euro.

Cool. Looks like spread all over. Definitively not what I thought it would be.

Thanks. Sent you via WeTransfer link because AFAIK gmail doesn't allow zip file attachments

Do you still accept submissions? Can I send you mine?

Why is it pointless? Maybe its pointless for you because you're not member of that subclade, but for some of us that are members we find that information interesting, especially if our own subclades that we belong to split off very early on.

Target: who_cares_scaled Distance: 3.3894% / 0.03389360 59.4 Balkan_N 24.6 East_European_Hunter_Gatherer 11.6 CHG_Georgia_Kotias.SG 2.6 Zagros_N 1.8 WHG Its kind of similar to my FamilyTreeDNA ancient origins

They made me closest to Albanians. Previously with G25 I was closest to Macedonians.

Balto-Slavic split is pure theory. I wouldn't assign it too much value. Real Slavic origin estimation as a recognizable group of people is somewhere between 3rd and 8th century CE

I-Y3120's estimated TMCRA is quite before supposed Slavic ethnogenesis (or at least supposed ethnogenesis based on historic records). Even some of the subclades are too early to be connected to Slavs, although the present day population tested are mostly if not all Slavs.

Highly doubt that all I-Y3120 were initially Slavs.

Maybe its not "simulated", but its almost like a simulated

It means you just share some SNP with that sample. It could be at any given instance of time. It does not mean that you descend from that sample. Some of the samples I got were about 20 000 years old, so its normal they have a lot of descendants and all over the world right now.

Yes, but fun has to be based on some solid evidence. These calculators are good estimators, but the estimations can also go wrong and become misleading. That's why I said finding related historic samples by IBS methodology is only relevant thing in all of this.

Yes, regarding this Egyptian JK2888, this dumb calculators predicted I have something to do with him, but when I got the actual IBS results they of course did not had me having any African sample. I did get some exotic samples from Asia and North America but that's it

First off, I don't trust any of the calculators like G25 or K13/15/etc. Second, and about DNAGenics, the only two things worthy of mentioning there is Shared Root Matches (because they're using IBS methodology) and they tell you on which parts of your genome you don't have any historic matches.

@thunorr Very similar to Illustrative DNA in my case:

Based on DNA results I believe some ancient Balkan people - be it Greeks, Thracians, Illyrians, or some others. IllustrativeDNA gives me 62-63% Neolithic Anatolian farmer, putting me close to quite close to Neolithic Balkans. DNAGenics Shared Roots Europe option confirms that with majority...