We don't have samples of the CHG ancestral component of steppe, so qpAdm adds both CHG and Iran N to get something closest to it. Steppe has something CHG/Iran N related that has been in Eastern Europe for a long time/
What every academic paper, i wouldnt even call those papers, they are highschool project level of quality. I use outgroups similar to Southern arc, they completely debunk the unscientific anti-qpAdm rule papers you sent. If you have read qpAdm theory you would have known that you have to include...
What antagonistic attidude? Are we not supposed to debate on a genetics forum? I'm trying to explain to you that you are basing everything on the misuse of qpAdm. The paper you base your models on broke every single qpAdm standard, all the qpAdm rules.
Anything can pass peer reviewing, for...
Impossible models, post your right pops, i can tell that they are 100% unscientific, wrong, against qpAdm rules, against every single qpAdm standard.
The right pops are very important, you can make an italian score a passing p value with 100% Germanic or 100% Lebanese if your right pops are...
These are outliers, recent immigrants, mixed. They are clearly mixed outliers compared to the other samples from the area. This is just evidence of Greeks from colonies migrating in the iron age and it continues until Imperial Rome.
There are no samples with such high CHG/Iran N levels in the Bronze age, the Iron age samples seem to lack that. There is simply no evidence of such profiles being from the Bronze age. I sent you above models with tons of bronze and iron age samples. None of them are like that. Sign of a sample...
Where is the 30-40% Iran N Neolithic Italian sample? For modern South Italians to have so much Iran N they would need a high steppe and high Iran N source at the same time, which samples is it? Give me the sample ID.
C6's existence prior to the arrival of these groups is doubtful. There's no evidence of C6's presence during the Bronze Age, and it's challenging to identify any Bronze Age Italian samples resembling the C6 cluster.
The idea that C6 was a native group forming during the Bronze Age lacks support...
Thats because if you have a big capital cosmopolitan city that has a ton of West Anatolians, Germanics, Italics, Levantines and people mixed with all of these with various proportions then obviously you will find samples that cluster with modern Italians from all regions. The C6 cluster is a...
These are unscientific models with unscientific references/outgroups that broke all qpAdm theory rules/standards, just because a model got a good p value it doesn't mean its true. Many papers are breaking qpAdm standards just to push their own biases. Most people reading the paper don't know...
The studies havent proven anything, their theories are absolutely invalidated by the fact that they included confirmed random mixed outliers in their C clusters. The just made arbirtary clusters based on coincidental PCA positions
For example when you simulate 50% Germanic + 50% Levantine it...
The c6 people from the imperial age were mixed with 100 populations. In the C6 cluster you sent me there was a literal half Germanic and half Levantine individual. They just found a bunch of samples that coincidentally plot together on PCA and assumed they must be related.
It is 100% impossible...
C6 is not a real population anyway, they are samples that are mixed with everything that coincidentally cluster with Italians. Some are literal Germanic-Levantine mixes.
Where did you get WGS from and how much was it.
Keep in mind that good p value doesnt matter if your references are not strict enough. You can make models get good p value if you dont give qpAdm proper references/right pops to check if something else is needed. The way qpAdm works is that if...
Your p value is very bad, 9-71e-10 = 0.000000000971. It is not close to 0.05 at all.
Do you know how to read 9-71e-10?
on qpAdm you are not supposed to rank p values yourself. qpAdm theory clealy states that higher p value models are not better, all that matters is that the p value is above...
Slavic in South Italy must be Byzantine related.
Germanics definitely left a small impact on South Italy and Sicily, its clear on G25, if its directly or indirectly from North Italians i dont know. The same thing happened in Cyprus, mainland Greeks before 1000 ad moved to Cyprus and brought...
This model passed but its inflating North Euro stuff because South Italians might need some high steppe Cetina related proxy plus a little bit of Slavic.
right = c('Ethiopia_4500BP.DG', 'Morocco_Iberomaurusian', 'Turkey_N', 'Iran_TepeAbdulHosein_N', 'Russia_Samara_EBA_Yamnaya', 'Bichon_WHG'...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.