Search results

Sorry, where are these results trickling in from? Have any new samples been released from Ancient Greece (or rumors)?

Models come and go like the wind. From Olaide 2021 we know the roman imperial cluster was very distinct to balkans IA. For northern Greeks/ South Balkans, it seemed that Iron-Age Greek + Slav worked fine, has anyone does these qpadm runs for Italians? Do they pass? I'm curious, shouldn't seem...

The current linguistic consensus is that Albanian is a thracian or dacian language, and that is definitely has a lot of dacian influence. This combined with the fact that the Iron-Age Moldova samples (scy197,192,305,300) plot extremely close to Albanians means something may be happening...

Albanians descend from a bottleneck population, that most likely move down from Kosovo/far-North Albanian alps in the early-medieval, as suggested by the current linguistic/topynomic consensus academically , them having more Thracian/Dacian ancestry than Greeks is undeniable just by simply...

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the samples uncovered in Viminacium all come from the same period? It showed native balkanites living alongside anatolians/levantines/ethiopians(kek), in contrast the imperial roman samples all seem to be distinct from IA romans.

uqrmaie1 . github . io /admixtools/ articles /recipes . html (easiest one to follow) uqrmaie1 . github . io /admixtools/ articles /admixtools . html The second one also provides context for what the input files are aswell, for example.

For admixtools running it is pretty easy, you just follow one of the main two tutorials on github and type some commands in RStudio. I can download any dataset from Reichlab and run qpadm on any sample, the thing is all the samples im playing with have to be in the dataset already, I have no...

I was reffering to G25, and the almost arbitrary methodology used by the people on anthrogenica. Afaik they just made it all up. Hell, the creator of nmonte calls the scaling process davidski used amateurish and disavows, now its funny how people there post scaled calculator runs like they are...

Why don't these guys use formal tests for their admixture runs, since when are PCAs used for admixture? Also what is considered a "good fit"; you can get <2% on the Albanian average with Myceanean + BGR_IA/HRV_IA + Slav. Are we just using arbitrary standards of <1.5% now? How is this supported?

You've not provided a single argument. Also.... looking at the spread of the IA balkans cluster in the viminacium paper you know better than to assume 1 iron-age sample can cover everything. Also explain to me where MJ12 came from. Was he a bell-beaker? What about the E-V13 Iron-Age scy197 who...

Thats a misnomer, you mean the proto-Albanians.

As a piece of anecdotal evidence; I score 3% Finnish on DNA.LAND.

Scy197 was E-V13, and they were identified as part of the SE Europe cluster of the paper they were mentioned in... also they were found in Moldova. Are you denying that Dacians would have had higher steppe than BGR_IA, and that we couldve received our increase shift to UKR_Catacomb from these...

Those eastern balkans samples are mj_12, scy197, scy192. Presumably dacians/getae. I was speaking against people like peloponessian in the thread though, who *did* say they were descended from them. As for Illyrians, many Albanians are on the HRV:EBA sample or HRV_IA, though I think we are...

How did you get these PCAs they look amazing? Ha thanks, pretty easy to do actually. Just go on vahaduo g25 views, select europe 2 from the dropdown menu. Then you add individual samples, unclick them on the legend (so the dots dissapear) and click "disable fault lines" on the top right of...

There is no reason for us to be BGR_IA + Slavic. The PCA says all; Albanians descend from Illyrians + Steppe heavy eastern balkaners: but I'm suppose to believe we are actually descended from near easterners + slavs, and somehow maintained our culture and spirit through that admixture... also...

I don't think the Balkans IA cluster is accounting for steppe-heavy eastern-balkan groups. Look at scy192, scy197 (E-V13), cimmerian_o mj12. Also this "Iron Age Balkans" group is simply the result of the qpgraph assigning all the samples into random clusters right? For all we know they can have...

That decoration is 99x more likely to be Thraco-Illyrian (esp. Illyrian) in origin rather than jewish, haha.