• Don't want to see ads? Install an adblocker like uBlock Origin or use a Europe-based privacy-friendly browser like Vivaldi or Mullvad.

Search results

  1. G

    ATP9 (MBA Iberia, ca. 1600 BC)

    All 23 ancient American samples from the paper that included MARC1492 have appeared in all my admixture analyses for about a year and a half now. Many European populations have hair that is considerably finer than the hair of Middle Eastern and North African Caucasoids, and some ancient...
  2. G

    ATP9 (MBA Iberia, ca. 1600 BC)

    Only a small percentage of the Mongoloid populations you mention have skin that could be described as white. Most of them have skin that ranges from yellow to brown. And Amerindians don't have the Mongoloid depigmentation mutations. They arose in Asia long after Amerindians had branched off...
  3. G

    ATP9 (MBA Iberia, ca. 1600 BC)

    No. Hair doesn't magically change color after death. Here's a quote from Warren Royal Dawson that Thor Heyerdahl included in the section "Tall stature, narrow face, and non-Mongoloid hair on Paracas mummies" in his 1952 work American Indians in the Pacific: And as I said above, a painting from...
  4. G

    ATP9 (MBA Iberia, ca. 1600 BC)

    Absurd rubbish. I can tell from the ignorance displayed in these comments that people don't even bother to look at what I've posted on my blog before ridiculing me and branding me a "kook". In my post "Statuettes of the White Gods" I included the following quote from Pedro Pizarro, cousin of...
  5. G

    ATP9 (MBA Iberia, ca. 1600 BC)

    Right, just pretend that Cieza de León didn't write the following about the Chachapoyas: Just pretend that the photographs of Chachapoya remains with wavy brown and red European hair and not stiff black Mongoloid Amerindian hair, linked to on my blog, don't exist. Just pretend that the...
  6. G

    ATP9 (MBA Iberia, ca. 1600 BC)

    There hasn't been any new data to analyze recently. I look at many more SNPs than others do.
  7. G

    ATP9 (MBA Iberia, ca. 1600 BC)

    No, it isn't, because none of the early farmers were R1b-M269. Some were R1b-V88, but none were R1b-M269. And again, ATP2, ATP3, ATP7, ATP9 and ATP20 had significant Eastern European autosomal DNA, which none of the early farmers had. It's not known whether ATP3 was L23, L51, L151, U106, P312...
  8. G

    ATP9 (MBA Iberia, ca. 1600 BC)

    Because just about everybody, yourself included, claims that R1b-M269, Eastern European autosomal DNA, and Indo-European languages didn't spread to Western Europe until well after 3000 BC. ATP3 and the other El Portalón samples prove them wrong. And so far it's all R1b-Z2103, not the R1b-L51...
  9. G

    ATP9 (MBA Iberia, ca. 1600 BC)

    In other words: "I don't care what the data says, only an official proclamation from an academic authority can make something true or false." I on the other hand couldn't care less what the academics say. I look only at the data, and the data leaves no doubt that ATP3 was R1b-M269.
  10. G

    ATP9 (MBA Iberia, ca. 1600 BC)

    The El Portalón samples ATP2 (2899–2678 BC), ATP3 (3516–3362 BC), ATP7 (3345–2944 BC), ATP9 (1750–1618 BC), and ATP20 (2289–2050 BC) all had significant amounts of Eastern European admixture. My admixture analyses have shown that for a long time now. People have either not noticed it or...
Back
Top