Recent content by Miroslav

There is new research article, "R1a frequency, subclades and origin of Croats and South Slavs" (PDF at Academia.edu). In the Eupedia's article Haplogroup R1a (Y-DNA) are made several outdated and erroneous claims: - There exist regional disparities, but they are more local and not so much on...

As other already responded it is indeed garbage. There's nothing interesting about it. The guy is known for advancing autochtonous theory which long time ago became debunked but he is doing it by misunderstanding and misinterpreting scientific data and YFull Ytree making ridiculous false claims...

Considering Y-DNA and atDNA and "strange" downfall of the archaeological culture would argue that burning is probably related to violent interaction with Indo-Europeans. but there exist various theories.

@Moesan, argument is genetics itself. We are dealing with a single Proto-Celtic lineage from Central Europe thousands of years ago. Of course we won't have any recognizable Proto-Celtic input into Proto-Slavic ethnogenesis by now. We are not speaking about cultural exchnage, although some traces...

It is a false argument. In your article about I2-L621 which (represented by one subclade) is today mainly found in (South)Eastern Europe (Slavs) mention your CT culture theory on a basis of an assumption. Until when this assumption will stay there? Until you have 1000 CT samples? That is...

I2-L621+ was not part of Neolithic culture in both Southeastern and Eastern Europe because it migrated from Central European late Bronze Age culture to Eastern Europe and from there in the Middle Ages migrated to Southeastern Europe as well as partly Central Europe.

No, as other contemporary studies they used 2016/17 ISOGG phylogeny tree which still had I2c hence I2a1a2a is I2-L1286 which is not and cannot be ancestral to I2a1b2-L621. We have three samples from 2018 study all G2a; numerous samples from Neolithic-Chalcolithic archaeological cultures...

Confirmed, but wrong I2a subclade.

As expected the three I2 samples don't belong to I2-L621 subclade. In the Eupedian article about Haplogrup I2 > Haplogroup I2a1b (M423) > Haplogroup I2a1b-L621 is claimed: This is completely wrong and should be removed since the theory is not based on any evidence or even worse is outdated for...

See Anthrogenica thread posts from page 332 onward as we already have G25 coordinates. He possibly was some mixed sample, not close to the contemporary Croats and Hungarians as paper suggested which only shows how much the paper was shallow in analysis and conclusions. Target: ZEM23Distance...

R-Y2619 as we know has the strong Middle Eastern and Ashkenazi Jewish cluster but until we know sample's positive/negative SNPs we can only guess. Who knows, POP23 possibliy belonged to some unknown (sub)clade.

Indeed, in the study is said, quote, "Our single individual from Popova zemlja, Croatia_Pop_RomanP, provides rare genomic data for Croatia after the Bronze Age33. (Table 1, Fig. 4a, Supplementary Table S1). We find this individual clustering with present-day populations of Croatia, Bulgaria and...

It has nothing to do with Anatolia or Middle East. PO23 most probably was a member of the Sarmatian tribe of Iazyges who lived in the very vicinity of Beli Manastir in Baranja i.e. to the northeast of the site and region the sample was found. In the very calibrated age the Iazyges became...

No and nothing will. The debate reached a dead end. All the data confirms that the clade I-CTS10228 most probably originates somewhere in Central Europe before its subclade, roughly I-Y3120, moved to Eastern Europe where became an integral part of the Proto-Slavic ethnogenesis. From regions...

It doesn't matter, the thing is that's an assumption on the emergence of Chodove in the region. What's their early history, only God knows. On Czech wiki is said that, translate, "The Chodas appeared in written sources during the 13th century and there are disputes as to whether their origin...